This is the mail archive of the gdb@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On Feb 19, 9:33am, David Carlton wrote:
On Wed, 19 Feb 2003 09:54:50 -0500, Andrew Cagney <ac131313 at redhat dot com> said:
> One thing GCC(4) and GDB are now is encouraging exprementation on > branches development to always occure on branches cut from the the > relevant repository.
Would Red Hat be happy hosting significant branches for other companies?
I assume you're referring to the sources.redhat.com repository, right?
I think the answer is "yes", so long as the branch in question is intended to (eventually) further mainline gdb development. If the branch is just some custom bit of work that is likely to never make it to the mainline, probably not.
Would those other companies be happy depending on Red Hat's CVS servers?
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |