On Tue, Mar 18, 2003 at 12:28:47PM -0500, Andrew Cagney wrote:
>That would be a very bad assumption. They are pratically guarenteed to
>>be different.
>
>
>Then what do you mean by a "dwarf2 frame"? I'd assume you meant the
>CFA, but it sounds like you mean a frame for which we have dwarf2
>.debug_info.
A frame with debug info provided by dwarf2. CFI gives the register
info, location expressions give the variable info, ...
What started out as a simple cfi-frame looks like it might need to
evolve into dwarf2-frame ...
DWARF-2 debug info does not corelate with CFI info. For instance, GCC
will generate DWARF-2 CFI with stabs debug info. It will also generate
CFI with no debug info at all, or DWARF-2 info without any CFI (if
requested).