This is the mail archive of the
gdb@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: <cpu>-frame.c, frame/<cpu>.c, config/<cpu>/frame.c, ...
Andrew Cagney writes:
> config/<cpu>/*.{mt,mh,h} are all
> being deleted, so adding files to that directory would make for
> confusion.
I dunno about confusion.
The consistency with gcc and gas is nice.
(while gas doesn't have config/<cpu>, neither did gcc until way back when,
not that I'm suggesting gas should have config/<cpu>, just that
both have config/<something> for target files).
If one is going to try to reduce the number of files in the top level dir,
to me having all the target specific files in config/<cpu>
seems reasonable (and more preferable than having them littered about
in the top level directory and various subdirs).