This is the mail archive of the gdb@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: GDB 6

From: Andrew Cagney <ac131313 at redhat dot com>
To: Michael Elizabeth Chastain <mec at shout dot net>
Cc: gdb at sources dot redhat dot com
Date: Fri, 09 May 2003 16:25:26 -0400
Subject: Re: GDB 6
References: <200305091817.h49IHiYN011921@duracef.shout.net>

Andrew Cagney writes:

Given this, I think the next release of GDB should be named ``GDB 6''.
I was hoping that it would be gdb 5.4, and that we would tell
everyone that has 5.3 that it's good for them to upgrade to 5.4.
Guess I'm outvoted. :)

It's all marketing anyway :-)

The last time I compared 5.3 to HEAD was more than a month ago.
HEAD was in pretty good shape then -- better than gdb-5_3-branch
was when it was branched.

I will try to get back to testing and reporting soon, but I can't
promise anything.

Mostly yes.

[poor] Kevin keeps finding problems with with the MIPS and the new frame code. I'd suspect a similar situtation with other architectures. So when it works it works well, but when it fails it really goes down - typical behavior for a new .0 release :-^

Andrew

References:
- Re: GDB 6
  - From: Michael Elizabeth Chastain

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]