Re: FYI: A new C++ demangler

[Andrew Cagney <ac131313 at redhat dot com>]

> Andrew Cagney <ac131313@redhat.com> wrote:
> | However, there is the SIM directory .....
>
> Yes.  Apparently Nathanael doesn't seem to understand that C++
> can be used productively for system programming.

Er?

> Nathanael Nerode <neroden@twcny.rr.com> wrote
> | > We *don't* want to add such a build requirement for GCC or binutils,
> | > for very good reasons (a lot of systems don't ship with a C++
> | > compiler).  HJ keeps proposing a *completely* demented idea, which
> | > is that the new demangler will be used if a C++ compiler happens to
> | > be lying around during build, and otherwise the broken demangler
> | > will be used.  I wish he'd see what's wrong with that picture.