> > I picked on solib-svr4 because it's the one normally found lacking.
At
> > least one of the solib backends already does this - probably SOM?
>
> So you're saying that you're not receptive to this patch but you'd
consider
> a svr4 patch for the load catchpoints?
If it could be moved out to solib.c, I'd be receptive to it. I'm also
willing to look at a patch which modifies solib-svr4.c, but I'd prefer
one which handles all off the solib backends in one fell swoop.
The patch is for breakpoint.c. It's in the print_it_typical() function
which handles output when a breakpoint is hit. I'm not sure how I would put
this into solib.c.