This is the mail archive of the gdb@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [RFC] upload/download command


On Mon, Nov 17, 2003 at 10:35:12AM -0500, Kris Warkentin wrote:
> > > I would like to keep these things in our protocol but it might be useful
> to
> > > generalize the interface out to core gdb.  What I'm thinking is that I
> > > create a general upload/download command that uses a hook into the
> target's
> > > code for any special functionality.  We could have a general one for
> native
> > > targets which would basically be 'copy' (probably not all that useful
> but
> > > there for completeness) and just print 'not implemented' for targets
> which
> > > don't define the hooks.
> >
> > Rather don't implement it for native I think... hm, might be easier to
> > test the core parts if we did.
> 
> That's what I was thinking....it doesn't really hurt anything.
> 
> > > Any ideas, comments, suggestions, etc.?
> >
> > For starters, how about describing how it works in your protocol?
> > Obviously this could be useful to gdbserver.  For mechanics, it may
> > want to be another target_read_partial()...
> 
> We actually have a remote_fileopen command in our protocol.  The host sends
> an open command to the target and then just sends blocks of data for the
> target server to write out.  Then a close message tells the remote to close
> it.  It's basically identical to an ordinary open command so you can open on
> the remote for reading/writing/etc.

Sounds like a good fit for target_read_partial with the exception that
we don't have open/close right now.  I don't think we'd need to add
them for this; for that kind of copy, the remote could assume that it
would keep the file open until we'd read the whole file.  Might be more
efficient not to.

> I'm not sure about gdbserver though.  Do you even presume the existence of a
> filesystem on the remote?

Yes.  Don't confuse gdbserver with the generic remote protocol;
gdbserver is a Unix-equivalent (Linux only right now) stub, using
ptrace.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
MontaVista Software                         Debian GNU/Linux Developer


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]