This is the mail archive of the gdb@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

RE: regarding transparent data ranges (in tracepoint support)


--- "Newman, Mark (N-Superior Technical Resource Inc)"
<mark.newman@lmco.com> wrote:
> Sorry about the tunnel vision.  When the SUT exits
> we loose all of the
> tracepoint data in target memory. Stopping that from
> happening is the
> next thing on my list after I finish making
> interrupt work.  After the
> program finishes it should not exit without an ok
> from the engineer.
> 
> So Ankit if that is what you are looking to do I
> agree completely.
> However can't gdbserver do something more like the
> restart that occurs
> with a "w" or "x" status after the putpkt in the
> case statement in
> server.c
> 
>                                            Mark
> 


   thanks for the solution Mark.restarting the
debuggee would surely work,just that some overhead may
be involved.but it sort of gives me a feeling of
hacking around the solution since the debuggee would
be run twice,2'nd time just for the transparent data
ranges. thanks for the solution anyway.
  any comments on PTRACE_EVENT_EXIT ??

Ankit.

__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Free Pop-Up Blocker - Get it now
http://companion.yahoo.com/


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]