This is the mail archive of the gdb@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: C++/Java regressions


On Tue, Nov 25, 2003 at 09:14:31AM -0800, David Carlton wrote:
> On Tue, 25 Nov 2003 12:06:32 -0500 (EST), mec.gnu@mindspring.com (Michael Elizabeth Chastain) said:
> 
> > I asked:
> 
> mec> What is the correct output when a breakpoint is taken on
> mec> "A::bar(int) const" ?
> 
> Probably my first choice would be A::bar(int) const, and my second
> choice would be A::bar.  A::bar const seems a bit weird to me.  Having
> said that:
> 
> > After some deliberation, I decided that I want the test script
> > to be liberal in what it accepts.
> ...
> > If someone wants to spend time on making gdb's output better here,
> > that is okay with me.  But I decided that it's too low priority for
> > my attention and the list bandwidth.
> 
> > David C is that okay with you?
> 
> Yes, that's fine with me.  What is important is that the breakpoint be
> set on the correct method, and that the continue reach the correct
> breakpoint.  That is in fact happening; I don't really see the point
> of having a failing test there, or even a kfailing test.

This works for me too.

Meanwhile, fixing DMGL_PARAMS not to print the trailing const seems
like a reasonable change.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
MontaVista Software                         Debian GNU/Linux Developer


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]