This is the mail archive of the
gdb@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: Slow handling of C++ symbol names
- From: David Carlton <carlton at kealia dot com>
- To: mec dot gnu at mindspring dot com (Michael Elizabeth Chastain)
- Cc: ian at wasabisystems dot com, ac131313 at redhat dot com, drow at mvista dot com,gdb at sources dot redhat dot com, wcohen at redhat dot com
- Date: Wed, 03 Dec 2003 08:52:12 -0800
- Subject: Re: Slow handling of C++ symbol names
- References: <20031203164734.201124B35B@berman.michael-chastain.com>
On Wed, 3 Dec 2003 11:47:34 -0500 (EST), mec.gnu@mindspring.com (Michael Elizabeth Chastain) said:
> _ZStltI9file_pathSsEbRKSt4pairIT_T0_ES6_
> OLD: bool std::operator< <file_path, std::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > >(std::pair<file_path, std::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > > const&, std::pair<file_path, std::basic_string<char, > std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > > const&)
> NEW: bool std::operator<<file_path, std::string>(std::pair<file_path, std::string> const&, std::pair<file_path, std::string> const&)
Fascinating.
> The old demangler produces "operator< <", and the new demangler
> produces "operator <<". I'm not a name mangling expert but I think
> that "operator <" is correct here and the new demangler suffers from
> shift-operator-versus-template-syntax gotcha.
Yeah, that's a bug, even one which could cause problems for GDB.
David Carlton
carlton@kealia.com