This is the mail archive of the
gdb@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: Retire the MPW support from toplevel and binutils
- From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at false dot org>
- To: Andrew Cagney <cagney at gnu dot org>
- Cc: hjl at lucon dot org, Stan Shebs <shebs at apple dot com>,Jason Molenda <jmolenda at apple dot com>, binutils at sources dot redhat dot com,gdb at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: Fri, 2 Apr 2004 11:40:17 -0500
- Subject: Re: Retire the MPW support from toplevel and binutils
- References: <406239C8.6020106@apple.com> <C85C1008-7DFF-11D8-84DA-000393D457E2@apple.com> <4062FB6D.5060108@gnu.org> <D3C75D2C-7E96-11D8-9E08-000393D457E2@apple.com> <40635448.1000902@gnu.org> <4063585E.9090101@apple.com> <40635C52.5020102@gnu.org> <40635F0C.1050200@apple.com> <406D85BF.3020500@gnu.org>
On Fri, Apr 02, 2004 at 10:24:47AM -0500, Andrew Cagney wrote:
> >
> >>>Stan, what's the urgency? Why not wait until GDB 6.1 and BINUTILS 1.?
> >>>are released as that is obviously going to make everyones life easier.
> >>>What's that, a few extra weeks?
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>I have a bit of time available now, no guarantees about the future.
> >>Seeing as how the support has long been gone from GDB proper, I'm
> >>totally mystified as to why these files even matter to anybody one way
> >>or the other, let alone how keeping them makes "everyones life
> >>easier"?. Am I missing a scripting/packaging dependency or
> >>something?
> >
> >
> >Who knows whats going on with scripting/packaging.
>
> Stan,
>
> I see you've committed these changes. GDB 6.1 branch, and I suspect the
> BINUTILS branches will no longer snapshot:
Actually, it wasn't Stan.
revision 1.56
date: 2004/03/30 01:35:57; author: hjl; state: Exp; lines: +0 -5
Remove mpw-* from src-support.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer