This is the mail archive of the gdb@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Phasing out Dwarf 1?

From: Kean Johnston <jkj at sco dot com>
To: Stan Shebs <shebs at apple dot com>
Cc: Andrew Cagney <cagney at gnu dot org>,Michael Elizabeth Chastain <mec dot gnu at mindspring dot com>,ezannoni at redhat dot com, gdb at sources dot redhat dot com, jimb at redhat dot com
Date: Wed, 05 May 2004 11:43:27 -0700
Subject: Re: Phasing out Dwarf 1?
Organization: The SCO Group
References: <20040505052310.A2AF64B104@berman.michael-chastain.com> <4098FAA6.9020306@gnu.org> <40990E80.4090906@sco.com> <409932A9.3040504@apple.com>

This confuses me a bit - what debugging format would you use
if Dwarf 1 were no longer available?

I would have no choice but to either:
1) Change to a compiler that produced DWARF-2 or
2) Use an older version of GDB that supports DWARF-1.

Both are reasonable choices for most people, the second being
the least disruptive.

Kean

References:
- Re: Phasing out Dwarf 1?
  - From: Michael Elizabeth Chastain
- Re: Phasing out Dwarf 1?
  - From: Andrew Cagney
- Re: Phasing out Dwarf 1?
  - From: Kean Johnston
- Re: Phasing out Dwarf 1?
  - From: Stan Shebs

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]