Re: ada vs identical flex

[Andrew Cagney <cagney at gnu dot org>]

> I think I can get rid of the yyrealloc stuff altogether.  It seems that
> one of the rules in ada-lex is not really used, but causes the non-use
> of yyrealloc as a side-effect.  If you could, would you try the following
> patch with the problematic platform/flex version?  Thanks.

Built for me!  Thanks.

Andrew

> Paul Hilfinger
>
>
> Index: merge.224/gdb/ada-lex.l
> --- merge.224/gdb/ada-lex.l Wed, 06 Oct 2004 02:59:24 -0700 hilfingr
> +++ merge.224(w)/gdb/ada-lex.l Fri, 08 Oct 2004 03:18:25 -0700 hilfingr
> @@ -154,8 +154,6 @@ static int find_dot_all (const char *);
>  		   return CHARLIT;
>  		}
>  
> -\"{OPER}\"/{WHITE}*"(" { return processId (yytext, yyleng); }
> -
>  <INITIAL>\"	{
>  		   tempbuf_len = 0;
>  		   BEGIN IN_STRING;
> @@ -926,5 +924,5 @@ yywrap(void)
>  typedef void (*dummy_function) ();
>  dummy_function ada_flex_use[] = 
>  { 
> -  (dummy_function) yyrealloc, (dummy_function) yyunput
> +  (dummy_function) yyunput
>  };