This is the mail archive of the gdb@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: mcore-*-* target to be deleted?


Peter Barada wrote:
I (belatedly) noticed an announcement on the GDB web page that the mcore
target has been declared obsolete and is going to be deleted from gdb in
the next release.

I have made some inquiries about the impact this would have on our
customers, and although the response wasn't huge, it was definitely not
zero.  There's a small but determined population of developers who
continue to use gdb with mcore.  It also has a small but growing market
with small firms working through distributors, as well as a new design
group in China that prefers to use non-Microsoft tools.

I don't know if one vote matters, but I vote to save the mcore.

The mcore code has, unfortunatly, become very out of date. The mainline hasn't built since 6.2 was released, and with 6.3 past that broken code was dropped. This all came about because GDB's frame code was rewritten from scratch and the mcore was never updated to work with the new code.


The way to revive the mcore isn't through votes, nominations, or appointments, it's through code. A developer with an assignment contributes code to current standards (most importantly does not use deprecated interfaces) then it can very easily be re-integrated (and they may quickly find themselves in a more responsible role). Any questions on how to do it welcome(1).

Andrew

(1) Exprerience suggests that largely starting from scratch (using the existing code as a guideline) is easier. This is because the bulk of the current file is redundant.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]