This is the mail archive of the
gdb@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: Unwinding stack past main() when it has another name
On Thu, 2005-06-16 at 23:05, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 17, 2005 at 08:22:13AM -1100, Steven Johnson wrote:
> > Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> > >For some non-C languages we get the name of the main function from
> > >debug information, but for C it's always main()
> > >
> > >
> > This isnt always the case for embedded targets. There is no RULE that C
> > programs must have a main() function. It may be that most do by
> > convention, but they dont have to. In fact, main() can be a pain for
> > small embedded targets because it wants a return value and arguments,
> > which mean nothing for a program that isnt "launched" by a user on
> > demand, but the C compiler detects the special function name main() and
> > objects if it doesnt have the standard format. Programs dont even need
> > to have an entry point called _start. It all depends on how you set up
> > your link map.
>
> In fact you're wrong: there is a rule that C programs must have a
> main() function. It's in the language standard.
You are both right, and both wrong. In fact the standard says that two
things are permitted.
In a hosted environment the entry point to the application shall be
'main'. In a free-standing environment there is no constraint on the
entry point -- there may even be multiple entry points.
R.