This is the mail archive of the gdb@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Using reverse execution


> Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2005 11:02:50 -0700
> From: Stan Shebs <shebs@apple.com>
> Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com
> 
> Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> 
> >What features can be implemented without hacking the kernel?
> >
> If you limited reversing to designated regions, and single-stepped
> every instruction in the range, collected the exact data changes
> (by disassembling the instructions) and only allowed examination
> rather than re-executing from any given point, all that just needs
> existing GDB machinery. Is it useful?

Sorry, you lost me.  Can you describe this in smaller words?

> At least somebody thinks so, because I just described how the
> omniscient debugger works (using Java bytecodes instead of machine
> instructions).

As I understood the description of the omniscient debugger, it would
be very useful.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]