This is the mail archive of the gdb@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Separating "shell dir" output from GDB/MI output

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz at gnu dot org>
To: "jingzhao.ou" <jingzhao dot ou at gmail dot com>, gdb at sources dot redhat dot com
Date: Sat, 15 Oct 2005 14:29:37 +0200
Subject: Re: Separating "shell dir" output from GDB/MI output
References: <b5706cf10510082219w52af98f3qf85a19bba7c8131e@mail.gmail.com> <20051009123326.GA436@white> <b5706cf10510091004r205783ddoc36645fc59138f39@mail.gmail.com> <20051009171225.GA4295@nevyn.them.org>
Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz at gnu dot org>

> Date: Sun, 9 Oct 2005 13:12:26 -0400
> From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
> Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com
> 
> A simpler and more specific solution for this particular problem would
> be to run "shell" through pipes and MI encapsulate its output, to
> prevent it from playing with the user's terminal.  I think that's a
> good idea anyway.

I agree.  We just need to be careful to use the portable routines,
like pexecute or popen/pclose, and then it will work everywhere.

References:
- Separating "shell dir" output from GDB/MI output
  - From: jingzhao.ou
- Re: Separating "shell dir" output from GDB/MI output
  - From: Bob Rossi
- Re: Separating "shell dir" output from GDB/MI output
  - From: jingzhao.ou
- Re: Separating "shell dir" output from GDB/MI output
  - From: Daniel Jacobowitz

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]