This is the mail archive of the
gdb@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: PowerPC 603 Register Set Clarification
- From: Ron McCall <ronald dot mccall at snet dot net>
- To: gdb at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2005 12:08:14 -0700 (PDT)
- Subject: Re: PowerPC 603 Register Set Clarification
--- Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org> wrote:
> Sorry, I maint maint print registers. raw-reg will
> work just as well.
>
> I'm not sure (re the P packet). An empty response
> won't work. But 00
> should work well enough, or else use 'x'.
I missed maint print registers after seeing the
raw-registers subcommand. Good to know. Thanks.
I didn't know about the 'x' response but I see it in
fetch_register_using_p() in remote.c and sure enough,
that's what makes it happy! (An error, empty response
or '0' response certainly don't make it happy.)
Thanks!
Ron McCall