This is the mail archive of the gdb@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Fwd: Maintainer policy for GDB

From: Jim Blandy <jimb at red-bean dot com>
To: gdb at sourceware dot org
Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2005 12:38:19 -0800
Subject: Re: Fwd: Maintainer policy for GDB
References: <20051117044801.GA4705@nevyn.them.org> <8f2776cb0511162240q6f550008udda9803b5253fd88@mail.gmail.com> <8f2776cb0511162244u5274377m70684a364a8a7edd@mail.gmail.com> <20051117140353.GA11432@nevyn.them.org> <8f2776cb0511170907m18fb4db5uae97fd3c2b210b9f@mail.gmail.com>

On 11/17/05, Jim Blandy <jimb@red-bean.com> wrote:
> On 11/17/05, Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org> wrote:
> > I'm not concerned by this.  It would be a pretty rude thing to do.  If
> > it happens once, we can handle that going up to the SC; if it happens
> > repeatedly, we can either clarify the reversion policy or censure the
> > maintainers involved, depending on the situation.
> >
> > I absolutely don't want a voting system involved in this process.
>
> There's no harm in giving it a try.

This was ambiguous.  I don't see any harm in trying things out as you
suggest.  If the SC ends up being called on too often, then we can
revisit things.

References:
- Maintainer policy for GDB
  - From: Daniel Jacobowitz
- Fwd: Maintainer policy for GDB
  - From: Jim Blandy
- Re: Fwd: Maintainer policy for GDB
  - From: Daniel Jacobowitz
- Re: Fwd: Maintainer policy for GDB
  - From: Jim Blandy

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]