This is the mail archive of the gdb@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: MI: reporting of multiple breakpoints


> Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2006 12:42:15 -0500
> From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
> 
> On Sat, Feb 18, 2006 at 06:23:14PM +0200, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > > Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2006 10:46:53 -0500
> > > From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
> > > Cc: Paul Koning <pkoning@equallogic.com>, ghost@cs.msu.su,
> > > 	gdb@sources.redhat.com
> > > 
> > > Do we want to uniformly present watchpoints as after-the-store, as
> > > a least common denominator and for consistency?
> > 
> > Don't we do this already?  I thought we did.
> 
> Yes, sorry I was unclear - that is what we do (although I think the
> implementation could use a little improvement, based on past
> conversations on this list).  Just wanted to present that there are,
> in fact, alternatives.

Well, FWIW, I think what we do is The Right Thing, and not just for
consistency's sake.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]