This is the mail archive of the
gdb@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: tracing, attaching to gdb processes
On Tue, Mar 14, 2006 at 07:04:37PM -0800, Ed Peschko wrote:
> > In general, you can get this by having a loop that does "while 1; step;
> > shell sleep 1" and hitting Control-C to stop it. Anything more
> > complicated than that involves the "hitting a button to stop" concept,
> > which means a GUI should be issuing the step commands - that's easy
> > to do when you're driving GDB.
>
> I don't understand..
>
> Are you suggesting that I make an expect script to control gdb, and then have
> that control script pass characters to the underlying process? Or something
> more exotic?
The GDB CLI scripting language has "while". See the manual.
It won't work very well though. The C-c will stop the sleep, but not
the while.
> And why can't this be built into gdb in the form of a 'set' variable? Either that,
> or a built-in high-resolution 'sleep' call that doesn't require spawning a shell?
You asked if GDB could do what you wanted; this is how it can. I
don't know whether it should have a built in command to do this or not.
> Or best yet, a builtin non-blocking read call that waits for a person's input?
I fail to see how this relates to what you wanted.
> well, I was thinking of something like gdbserver (which I wasn't aware existed)
> but now I see what people were talking about when they were saying 'use screen
> with your gdb processes' - I wasn't aware that screen could be started already
> detached, nor that you could run an alternate shell with screen (eg: 'gdb').
>
> Anyways, maybe this warrants an entry in the manual - its not only valgrind that
> could benefit from this workflow, but other processes, especially those run
> through inetd.
Maybe.
> It would be very cool, for example, if you could somehow trigger gdb to run with
> an instantiated call, say:
>
> /* my code here */
> spawn_gdb()
> /* my code here */
>
> and then a gdb would be spawned automatically and attached to the process at the
> point right following the spawn_gdb call.
GDK/GTK already have code to do this. So do lots of other libraries.
It's not something that needs to be distributed with GDB; it's just
if (fork () == 0)
execlp ("gdb", argv[0], getppid (), NULL);
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery