This is the mail archive of the gdb@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: GDB stub question?

From: Ramana Radhakrishnan <ramana dot radhakrishnan at codito dot com>
To: Inder <inderpreetb at gmail dot com>
Cc: gdb at sourceware dot org
Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2006 12:31:52 +0530
Subject: Re: GDB stub question?
References: <a1029acd0604232305m38dff2fcib2a0903c009d6c95@mail.gmail.com> <a1029acd0604232313t7e0bb829ia325f3e658fc34e9@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-to: ramana dot radhakrishnan at codito dot com

This means your stub is capable of doing single stepping by itself. S12
would mean give signal 12 to the debuggee.

>From the manual -> 

`S'SIG`;'ADDR -- step with signal
     Like `C' but step not continue.

If you need more help show a complete log of the remote protocol for the
steps you did and the behaviour you expected / observed. 


- Ramana

On Mon, 2006-04-24 at 11:43 +0530, Inder wrote:
> Hi All
> 
> I have ported a GDB stub for ARM based system, but when i tried doing
> source stepping GDB (GDB 6.4)  host sends the following packet to the
> target system:
> 
>   ---> $S12#b6
> 
> which tell the target to actually do a single instruction step. I
> believe in the previous versions of GDB source stepping was done by
> setting the breakpoint to the next source line and then continue.
> 
> Am i missing something here.
> 
> Any help will be appriciated.
> 
> --
> Thanks,
> Inder

References:
- GDB stub question?
  - From: Inder
- GDB stub question?
  - From: Inder

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]