This is the mail archive of the gdb@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Problems with remote debugging on ARM


On Tue, May 16, 2006 at 08:18:05PM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> > Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 12:13:19 -0400
> > From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
> > 
> > On Tue, May 16, 2006 at 06:08:20PM +0200, Milrith wrote:
> > > I use a timer which is generating a signal every 10 ms (SIGALRM). As
> > > soon as timer_settime is called, there is a lot of network activity,
> > > the gdb client seems to be busy (when I step) and debugging is unusable.
> > > If i increase the period of this timer (to something like 50 ms) it is
> > > OK. Would there be a means to still be able to debug my program with
> > > the 10 ms period?
> > 
> > Right now there is no way to do this.  I had a patch for it long ago,
> > but it wasn't very nice, and I never had time to go back to it.  You
> > could hack your GDB stub to ignore SIGALRM, in the same way that it
> > ignores certain threading-related signals (assuming you're using
> > gdbserver).
> 
> Actually it wouldn't be such a bad idea to extend the remote protocol
> with something that allows GDB to specify the signals it's interested
> in.  Ultimately you want this in the OS such that the stub (or a
> native GDB) never even sees the signal.  Solaris and HP-UX have that
> functionality.

That is precisely what I did :-)

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]