This is the mail archive of the gdb@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org> writes: > On Fri, Aug 18, 2006 at 05:07:47PM +0200, Andreas Jaeger wrote: >> Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org> writes: >> >> > [...] >> > Good enough for me. Andreas, in that case, is the patch in >> > http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb/2006-07/msg00131.html OK? >> >> Why are you using your own cf macros? We have e.g. CFI_STARTPROC (see >> sysdeps/generic/sysdep.h) and those should be used, > > I wrote earlier: > >> But, FYI, you can't actually write the unwind tables for these using >> .cfi_* directives. I tried. I'd need at least three new directives >> to do it sanely (for uleb128 escapes, sleb128 escapes, and adding the >> "S" augmentation). So I did it by hand, basically copied from the >> i386 vDSO, but simpler since we don't need any pushes or pops. > > Even if I assume a brand new binutils which supports the "S" > augmentation, I would still need to hand-expand uleb128 and sleb128. > I thought there was another reason beyond that one too, but now I > can't remember it. I could try again (I did this but didn't save the > patch). But I really don't like having to assume the "S" support > is present and generating bogus unwind info if it isn't. > > I suppose I could simply omit the unwind info if it isn't. Want > me to try that? Ah I see. Ulrich, Roland, what do you suggest here? Andreas -- Andreas Jaeger, aj@suse.de, http://www.suse.de/~aj/ SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F FED1 389A 563C C272 A126
Attachment:
pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |