This is the mail archive of the gdb@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Is this the right list...


Actually, I did (always do) RTFM before posting.  I've found that to be less 
hassle than subscribing to a list, but realize I may be in the minority with 
that opinion;-).

gdb is still attached to the program.  The program forks itself twice turning 
itself into a daemon, and gdb is set to follow the child fork.  It seems to 
do this fine.  Obviously, I would normally have set breakpoints to capture 
it, but forgot to do so in one case, and figured there must be a way to get 
gdb's attention again.

Neither ctl-c nor kill worked; I had to "kill -9" it.  I don't understand 
that; the only signal the user program is catching is SIGALRM (14?).

On Thursday 03 May 2007 21:40, Joel Brobecker wrote:
> [yes, you can send questions about using GDB to this]
>
> > When a program goes off into a daemon, or an endless loop or whatever,
> > how do you get gdb attention (i. e., get a prompt so you can
> > stop/check/abort the program)?
>
> If GDB is still attached to your program, hitting control-c should
> interrupt your program and allow you to see where it is. Otherwise,
> your other option, if you are not attach, then just get the pid of
> your program, and attach GDB to it using "attach <pid>".
>
> The GDB documentation should provide you more details about this.
> (my very first lesson at engineering school was RTFM :-)


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]