This is the mail archive of the
gdb@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: Keeping binutils/{bfd, opcodes} and gdb/{bfd, opcodes} in synch.
- From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at false dot org>
- To: "Anmol P. Paralkar" <b07584 at freescale dot com>
- Cc: gdb at sourceware dot org
- Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 16:40:46 -0400
- Subject: Re: Keeping binutils/{bfd, opcodes} and gdb/{bfd, opcodes} in synch.
- References: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0706131513560.9640@ld0159-tx32.am.freescale.net>
On Wed, Jun 13, 2007 at 03:24:25PM -0500, Anmol P. Paralkar wrote:
> Hello,
>
> What is the general methodology for keeping the gdb/{opcodes, bfd, ...} and
> binutils/{opcodes, bfd, ...} in synch with each other? Is there some
> "synch policy" that GDB development follows? (I see quite a differential
> between these in gdb-6.6 and binutils-2.17).
That's because they weren't released at the same time, of course! The
two projects share a common CVS repository; their copies are exactly
the same.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery