This is the mail archive of the gdb@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Move GDB to C++ ?

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz at gnu dot org>
To: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at false dot org>
Cc: vladimir at codesourcery dot com, gdb at sources dot redhat dot com
Date: Fri, 01 Aug 2008 18:23:21 +0300
Subject: Re: Move GDB to C++ ?
References: <487658F7.1090508@earthlink.net> <g6rl1b$t7m$1@ger.gmane.org> <ufxppopyj.fsf@gnu.org> <20080801131312.GA14712@caradoc.them.org> <uwsj0n8zy.fsf@gnu.org> <20080801142048.GA18215@caradoc.them.org>
Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz at gnu dot org>

> Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2008 10:20:48 -0400
> From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
> Cc: vladimir@codesourcery.com, gdb@sources.redhat.com
> 
> On Fri, Aug 01, 2008 at 04:46:25PM +0300, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > The idea is that a maintainer cannot behave with the code as he
> > pleases, claiming that it's his time and therefore his, and only his,
> > business.
> 
> So this is an objection to the refactoring, not to how Vladimir spends
> his time working on GDB.

There were no references to refactoring in the paragraph you cited.
FWIW, it was a general concern, not something I concocted to justify
my more specific objections.

References:
- Re: Move GDB to C++ ?
  - From: Daniel Jacobowitz
- Re: Move GDB to C++ ?
  - From: Eli Zaretskii
- Re: Move GDB to C++ ?
  - From: Daniel Jacobowitz

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]