Re: gdb doesn't show all threads, but gdbserver does

[teawater <teawater at gmail dot com>]

My mean is maybe you can update this question and answer to FAQ in wiki. :)

On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 19:24, teawater <teawater@gmail.com> wrote:
> What about FAQ?
>
> On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 18:32, Norbert van Bolhuis
> <nvbolhuis@aimvalley.nl> wrote:
>>
>> Paul Pluzhnikov wrote:
>>>
>>> On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 2:24 PM, Andreas Schwab <schwab@suse.de> wrote:
>>>
>>>> It's actually libthread_db that needs a non-global symbol from
>>>> libpthread.
>>>
>>> IOW, it's a glibc feature :)
>>>
>>> Stripping libpthread appears to be a very common mistake:
>>>
>>> - we've seen it twice on this list in the last two weeks,
>>> - I made it myself 4 weeks ago, even though I *knew* that libpthread
>>>  must not be stripped.
>>>
>>> I wonder if we should warn glibc users? Something like:
>>>
>>>  Warning: your /lib64/libpthread.so.0 has been stripped.
>>>  GDB will not see other threads, and multithreaded debugging will
>>>  be unreliable.
>>>  See http://sourceware.org/gdb/wiki/... for further info.
>>>
>>
>> I consulted the GDB manual first, then google.
>>
>> http://sourceware.org/gdb/wiki is an interesting source of information.
>> I expect to see this common mistake being mentioned there, but I can't
>> find it.
>>
>> Anyway, thanks to everybody for all answers.
>>
>>
>