Re: MI register groups

[Chris Genly <chgenly at gmail dot com>]

Yes I saw that.  Thanks.  You are right that it would probably be
easier.  But I'd prefer to contribute to the Eclipse DSF project
rather than having to apply patches to my source every time a new DSF
is released.  I'm hoping in the long run defining register groups in
MI and providing patches to the DSF people will be less work.  We'll
see.  I may regret it. :-)

On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 11:24 AM, Marc Khouzam<marc.khouzam@ericsson.com> wrote:
>> -----Original Message-----

> ?/**
> ?* For the GDB GDBMI implementation there is only on group. The GPR and FPU registers are grouped into
> ?* one set. We are going to hard wire this set as the "General Registers".
> ?*/
>
> And then everything about register groups is being done without using MI or GDB.
> If such an approach is sufficient for you, it would be much easier to get done.
>
> Marc
>