This is the mail archive of the
gdb@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: Build question
- From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz at gnu dot org>
- To: danny dot backx at scarlet dot be
- Cc: tromey at redhat dot com, gdb at sourceware dot org
- Date: Tue, 01 Sep 2009 22:33:34 +0300
- Subject: Re: Build question
- References: <1250803105.11282.96.camel@pavilion> <m3fxbl2jib.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <83d46pgjkq.fsf@gnu.org> <1250877901.11282.116.camel@pavilion> <83ab1tgh9h.fsf@gnu.org> <1250880746.11282.128.camel@pavilion> <m3r5v425lu.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <1250931899.11282.142.camel@pavilion> <83skfkfa4n.fsf@gnu.org> <1251095160.16357.352.camel@pavilion> <1251828295.6106.119.camel@pavilion>
- Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz at gnu dot org>
> From: Danny Backx <danny.backx@scarlet.be>
> Cc: tromey@redhat.com, gdb@sourceware.org
> Date: Tue, 01 Sep 2009 20:04:55 +0200
>
> Apart from that, HAVE_DOS_BASED_FILE_SYSTEM is used in a number of
> sources (even though filenames.h appears to do much already) :
> ./libiberty/make-relative-prefix.c
> ./libiberty/basename.c
> ./libiberty/lbasename.c
> ./include/filenames.h
> ./bfd/archive.c
> ./gdb/utils.c
> ./gdb/cli/cli-cmds.c
> ./gdb/completer.c
> ./gdb/symtab.c
> ./gdb/source.c
One more thing: libiberty is a bit tricky, because it is used in many
projects apart of GDB, which might have their own ideas about the
appropriateness of using the DOS file-name semantics. So I would
leave that alone in the first approximation.