This is the mail archive of the gdb@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: No useful backtrace in core dump.

From: Baurzhan Ismagulov <ibr at radix50 dot net>
To: gdb at sourceware dot org
Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2010 10:49:47 +0200
Subject: Re: No useful backtrace in core dump.
References: <w2v8f4584b51004211940jb2dbf91fv75d263cead64d0b8@mail.gmail.com> <201004220818.o3M8INMG014249@glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <n2r8f4584b51004220135mcd87a739s6d4bde5c66917297@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 04:35:41PM +0800, äåæ wrote:
>       How about I use lower optimize option with GCC? If this still
> can't work, I will follow your suggestion...

IIUC, the thread implies that rebuilding glibc without
__attribute__((noreturn)) for abort() should solve the problem, but I
haven't tried that.

With kind regards,
-- 
Baurzhan Ismagulov
http://www.kz-easy.com/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: No useful backtrace in core dump.
  - From: 代尔欣

References:
- No useful backtrace in core dump.
  - From: 代尔欣
- Re: No useful backtrace in core dump.
  - From: Mark Kettenis
- Re: No useful backtrace in core dump.
  - From: 代尔欣

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]