This is the mail archive of the
gdb@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: Switch -Wunused-variable on?
On Wed, 25 Apr 2012, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> >> It also requires an unconditional declaration and definition of
> >> target_frobnicate_harder.
> >
> > Yes, but do you see at as advantage or disadvantage?
>
> It makes your example non-working as written due to the missing
> declaration.
The declaration should be moved outside the conditional, I've overlooked
that, sorry. If target_frobnicate_harder is external then the prototype
will be in a header anyway.
And such an unconditional declaration is actually good for conditional
pieces that are rarely enabled -- people making bulk changes will still
receive the usual diagnostics about this function's argument type
compatibility, etc. even if this piece of code is actually not used for
the configuration they chose, as long as this source file is compiled at
all.
Then you don't actually need a definition, because the call will be
optimised away (together with the whole enclosing "if (0)" block) by the
compiler. There's nothing wrong with having a declaration and no
definition for an entity that's never eventually used.
Maciej