This is the mail archive of the
gdb@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
RE: DW_AT_count is the same as DW_AT_upper_bound?
- From: Rouslan Korneychuk <rouslank at msn dot com>
- To: Jan Kratochvil <jan dot kratochvil at redhat dot com>
- Cc: "gdb at sourceware dot org" <gdb at sourceware dot org>
- Date: Fri, 5 Jul 2013 15:26:55 -0400
- Subject: RE: DW_AT_count is the same as DW_AT_upper_bound?
- References: <BAY171-W1225181D47297CD8C224728D67D0 at phx dot gbl>,<20130705190844 dot GA1296 at host2 dot jankratochvil dot net>
On Fri, 5 Jul 2013 21:08:44 +0200, Jan Kratochvil wrote:
> But your sample DWARF is a case of dynamic bounds which are supported only in
> experimental branch(es) so far:
> http://sourceware.org/gdb/wiki/FortranVLA
> particularly the branch jankratochvil/vla of git://sourceware.org/git/archer.git
I see. Then it's a wonder it works as well as it does.
Thanks for the quick reply.