This is the mail archive of the
glibc-bugs@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the glibc project.
[Bug nptl/245] lowlevellock.h not installed
- From: "egmont at uhulinux dot hu" <sourceware-bugzilla at sources dot redhat dot com>
- To: glibc-bugs at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: 30 Jun 2004 16:23:27 -0000
- Subject: [Bug nptl/245] lowlevellock.h not installed
- References: <20040630145727.245.egmont@uhulinux.hu>
- Reply-to: sourceware-bugzilla at sources dot redhat dot com
------- Additional Comments From egmont at uhulinux dot hu 2004-06-30 16:23 -------
Then why is bits/stdio-lock.h installed at all? It is unusable this way,
since tries to include <lowlevellock.h>. At least if this include statement
was surrounded by some #ifdef, but it isn't.
So then stdio-lock.h shouldn't be installed either to provide more a consistent
set of header files. IMHO it doesn't make any sense to install a header file
which is totally unusable due to missing dependencies.
(Believe me, I'd silently started to patch my gcc2 if I saw glibc simply
changing but remaining consistent to itself.)
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED
Resolution|WONTFIX |
http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.