This is the mail archive of the
glibc-bugs@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the glibc project.
[Bug math/592] ia64 math library needs updating
- From: "jakub at redhat dot com" <sourceware-bugzilla at sources dot redhat dot com>
- To: glibc-bugs at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: 27 Dec 2004 20:48:16 -0000
- Subject: [Bug math/592] ia64 math library needs updating
- References: <20041130055154.592.davidm@hpl.hp.com>
- Reply-to: sourceware-bugzilla at sources dot redhat dot com
------- Additional Comments From jakub at redhat dot com 2004-12-27 20:48 -------
I have checked the patch in #1 for ABI changes and appart from changing whole
bunch of symbols from STB_GLOBAL to STB_WEAK or vice versa did not see any
changes (and the weak <-> global changes are harmless). I haven't seen make
check regressions either.
The patch introduces one extra .plt slot for libc.so.6.1 (__libm_error_support),
so that should be fixed first. This is the result of dropping
libc_hidden_proto(__libm_error_support) from libm_support.h and
libc_hidden_def(__libm_error_support) from libc_libm_error.c.
As for licenses,
// Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without
// modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions are
// met:
//
// * Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright
// notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer.
//
// * Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above copyright
// notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer in the
// documentation and/or other materials provided with the distribution.
//
// * The name of Intel Corporation may not be used to endorse or promote
// products derived from this software without specific prior written
// permission.
lines are missing in
sysdeps/ia64/fpu/e_lgamma_r.c
sysdeps/ia64/fpu/e_lgammaf_r.c
sysdeps/ia64/fpu/e_lgammal_r.c
sysdeps/ia64/fpu/w_lgamma.c
sysdeps/ia64/fpu/w_lgammaf.c
sysdeps/ia64/fpu/w_lgammal.c
and in those files $Id... Exp $ RCS markups aren't removed either while they IMHO
should be.
--
http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=592
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.