This is the mail archive of the
glibc-bugs@sourceware.org
mailing list for the glibc project.
[Bug manual/5461] New: LONG_LONG_MAX vs LLONG_MAX in range-of-type section of manual
- From: "virdiq at gmail dot com" <sourceware-bugzilla at sourceware dot org>
- To: glibc-bugs at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: 9 Dec 2007 07:26:19 -0000
- Subject: [Bug manual/5461] New: LONG_LONG_MAX vs LLONG_MAX in range-of-type section of manual
- Reply-to: sourceware-bugzilla at sourceware dot org
It appears that the current online manual refers to LONG_LONG_MAX and
ULONG_LONG_MAX at:
http://www.gnu.org/software/libc/manual/html_node/Range-of-Type.html#Range-of-Type
Instead of LLONG_MAX and ULLONG_MAX as defined in limits.h (checked against
2.6.1 and 2.7).
LONG_LONG_MAX/ULONG_LONG_MAX aren't defined in limits.h as the manual seems to
indicate.
--
Summary: LONG_LONG_MAX vs LLONG_MAX in range-of-type section of
manual
Product: glibc
Version: unspecified
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: manual
AssignedTo: roland at gnu dot org
ReportedBy: virdiq at gmail dot com
CC: glibc-bugs at sources dot redhat dot com
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5461
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.