This is the mail archive of the
glibc-bugs@sourceware.org
mailing list for the glibc project.
[Bug libc/5742] New: stdio poor file buffering in "w+b" mode
- From: "olivier dot paquet at gmail dot com" <sourceware-bugzilla at sourceware dot org>
- To: glibc-bugs at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: 6 Feb 2008 16:29:03 -0000
- Subject: [Bug libc/5742] New: stdio poor file buffering in "w+b" mode
- Reply-to: sourceware-bugzilla at sourceware dot org
Opening a file with mode "w+b" and then doing repetetive fseek() and fwrite()
calls will result in pointless read() calls to the kernel. The output of
'strace' on the process looks like this:
_llseek(3, 2424832, [2424832], SEEK_SET) = 0
read(3, "\0`\374\267\1\0\0\0E\3\0"..., 32768) = 14848
write(3, "\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0"..., 2560) = 2560
_llseek(3, 2424832, [2424832], SEEK_SET) = 0
read(3, "\0`\374\267\1\0\0\0E\3\0\0"..., 32768) = 17408
write(3, "\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0"..., 2560) = 2560
yet there are no fread() calls of any kind in the program. The reads are not
only useless, they trigger a catastrophic slowdown when this is done over nfs
with recent linux kernels, as reported in:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9566
I also checked glibc 2.7 and 2.7-20080204 and both have the exact same behavior.
Note that the above strace is for a file on nfs; on a local filesystem glibc
appears to use a smaller buffer but the read() calls are still there.
--
Summary: stdio poor file buffering in "w+b" mode
Product: glibc
Version: 2.3.6
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: libc
AssignedTo: drepper at redhat dot com
ReportedBy: olivier dot paquet at gmail dot com
CC: glibc-bugs at sources dot redhat dot com
GCC build triplet: i486-slackware-linux
GCC host triplet: i486-slackware-linux
GCC target triplet: i486-slackware-linux
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5742
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.