This is the mail archive of the
glibc-bugs@sourceware.org
mailing list for the glibc project.
[Bug libc/12515] clock() should provide better precision
- From: "siddhesh at redhat dot com" <sourceware-bugzilla at sourceware dot org>
- To: glibc-bugs at sourceware dot org
- Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2013 04:48:46 +0000
- Subject: [Bug libc/12515] clock() should provide better precision
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
- References: <bug-12515-131 at http dot sourceware dot org/bugzilla/>
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12515
Siddhesh Poyarekar <siddhesh at redhat dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #14 from Siddhesh Poyarekar <siddhesh at redhat dot com> ---
Pushed to master:
commit 58206c6863f6b861a5e2fa6d3599e487294ded63
Author: Siddhesh Poyarekar <siddhesh@redhat.com>
Date: Thu Jun 13 09:54:35 2013 +0530
Improve precision of clock() function on Linux
Resolves #12515.
Use CLOCK_PROCESS_CPUTIME_ID instead of times to get better precision
in the value returned by clock.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.