This is the mail archive of the gsl-discuss@sourceware.cygnus.com mailing list for the GSL project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: preparing a 0.4.1 release

To: Mark Galassi <rosalia@cygnus.com>
Subject: Re: preparing a 0.4.1 release
From: Brian Gough <bjg@netsci.freeserve.co.uk>
Date: Sun, 07 Feb 1999 20:11:03 +0000
CC: GSL discussion list <gsl-discuss@sourceware.cygnus.com>
References: <14012.29239.634305.676150@papageno.roadrunner.com> <36BCCC62.8A7B825D@netsci.freeserve.co.uk> <14013.57520.495520.575083@papageno.roadrunner.com>

Yes. The previous versions assumed stride = 1.

Mark Galassi wrote:
> In any case, what's the scoop on the stride parameter?  If we set it
> to 1 is it the same as what people are used to when they've never
> heard of strides in FFTs?

Follow-Ups:
- complex number API
  - From: Mark Galassi <rosalia@cygnus.com>

References:
- preparing a 0.4.1 release
  - From: Mark Galassi <rosalia@cygnus.com>
- Re: preparing a 0.4.1 release
  - From: Brian Gough <bjg@netsci.freeserve.co.uk>
- Re: preparing a 0.4.1 release
  - From: Mark Galassi <rosalia@cygnus.com>

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]