This is the mail archive of the gsl-discuss@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GSL project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: multifit.texi ambiguity?

To: keith dot briggs at bt dot com
Subject: Re: multifit.texi ambiguity?
From: Brian Gough <bjg at network-theory dot co dot uk>
Date: Mon, 14 May 2001 17:59:10 +0100 (BST)
Cc: gsl-discuss at sources dot redhat dot com
References: <F66469FCE9C5D311B8FF0000F8FE9E07095ECB28@mbtlipnt03.btlabs.bt.co.uk>

keith.briggs@bt.com writes:
 > There seems to be an inconsistency in multifit.texi in gsl 0.7.
 > At the top, f_i seems to be a squared residual in the first equation,
 > but in the example at the bottom it is a unsquared residual.
 > Probably the top equation should have \sum (f_i(x_1,\dots,x_p))^2.

Thanks, yes, the equation was missing the ^2 there.

References:
- multifit.texi ambiguity?
  - From: keith.briggs

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]