This is the mail archive of the gsl-discuss@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GSL project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Is GSL Thread Safe?

From: Brian Gough <bjg at network-theory dot co dot uk>
To: banerjee at wernicke dot ccn dot upenn dot edu
Cc: gsl-discuss at sources dot redhat dot com
Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2002 21:39:23 +0100 (BST)
Subject: Re: Is GSL Thread Safe?
References: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0204011529170.16511-100000@wernicke.ccn.upenn.edu>

banerjee@wernicke.ccn.upenn.edu writes:
 > Folks,
 > 
 > I searched through the GSL manual and found no occurrences of "thread." I 
 > conclude then, that GSL is not thread safe. Is this correct? If so, 
 > what would it require to make GSL trhead safe and has anyone worked in 
 > that direction?
 > 

The library is thread-safe.  I'll add a note mentioning that to the
usage chapter of the manual.

Brian

References:
- Is GSL Thread Safe?
  - From: banerjee

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]