This is the mail archive of the gsl-discuss@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GSL project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: specfunc error analysis - generated and propagated errors.

From: Brian Gough <bjg at network-theory dot co dot uk>
To: Linas Vepstas <linas at austin dot ibm dot com>
Cc: gsl-discuss at sources dot redhat dot com
Date: Sat, 11 Sep 2004 10:28:20 +0100
Subject: Re: specfunc error analysis - generated and propagated errors.
References: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0409052321560.17700@pasiphae.open.ac.uk><1094594632.2609.404.camel@bellerophon.lanl.gov><413F3EA9.4090601@open.ac.uk><16706.1908.696936.940235@network-theory.co.uk><20040910204749.GV9645@austin.ibm.com>

Linas Vepstas writes:
 > The user would need to include the appropriate chunk of gsl source
 > code in thier source code to make this work.   gcc can only inline
 > source code, not object code.  

I was thinking I would recompile the library.

-- 
Brian Gough

References:
- specfunc error analysis - generated and propagated errors.
  - From: Jonathan Underwood
- Re: specfunc error analysis - generated and propagated errors.
  - From: Gerard Jungman
- Re: specfunc error analysis - generated and propagated errors.
  - From: Jonathan G. Underwood
- Re: specfunc error analysis - generated and propagated errors.
  - From: Brian Gough
- Re: specfunc error analysis - generated and propagated errors.
  - From: Linas Vepstas

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]