This is the mail archive of the
gsl-discuss@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GSL project.
Re: Feedback from GSL folks on libflame 4.0
- From: Brian Gough <bjg at network-theory dot co dot uk>
- To: Rhys Ulerich <rhys dot ulerich at gmail dot com>
- Cc: jungman at lanl dot gov,gsl-discuss mailing list <gsl-discuss at sourceware dot org>,"Field G. Van Zee" <field at cs dot utexas dot edu>
- Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2010 20:21:41 +0000
- Subject: Re: Feedback from GSL folks on libflame 4.0
- References: <4a00655d1002171047t4e87fb85w88b609245e3f9a8e@mail.gmail.com><4B7D90B5.4020707@cs.utexas.edu><4a00655d1002181150j3975f69bk29084d5b50eeb974@mail.gmail.com>
At Thu, 18 Feb 2010 13:50:44 -0600,
Rhys Ulerich wrote:
> I'm willing to take a stab at providing the necessary error handling
> underneath flame to make it play nice with GSL's error handling
> model.
> The obvious choice is to adopt GSL's routines. However, flame is
> LGPL and so adopting GSL's GPLed error handling directly is not an
> option.
>
> Do you know of an LGPL project that you believe does a good job in
> this regard?
I think the amount of code is so small that the licensing shouldn't be
a concern here. If anyone wants to use the error macro definitions or
error handler from GSL under the LGPL I am fine with that.
--
Brian Gough