This is the mail archive of the
guile-gtk@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the Guile project.
Re: g-wrap and guile-gnome/gtk
- To: Rob Browning <rlb at cs dot utexas dot edu>
- Subject: Re: g-wrap and guile-gnome/gtk
- From: Ariel Rios <ariel at arcavia dot com>
- Date: Sun, 12 Nov 2000 14:11:30 -0500 (EST)
- cc: Marius Vollmer <mvo at zagadka dot ping dot de>, Ariel Rios <jarios at usa dot net>, guile-gtk at sourceware dot cygnus dot com, Miroslav silovic <silovic at zesoi dot fer dot hr>
On 12 Nov 2000, Rob Browning wrote:
> Marius Vollmer <mvo@zagadka.ping.de> writes:
>
>
> > Build-guile-gtk is still a one-off hack and needs to be redone
> > completely to make it reasonably clean. This includes the syntax of
> > the defs files themselves, but hopefully we can clean that up in a
> > backward compatible way because they are already defs files out there
> > that are distributed independently from guile-gtk.
There is a new spec file format that was created for general use.
The document is located somewhere in the GTK+ module. It is important
that g-wrap works with these new format. I think that in the case
of Guile-gtk / Gnome-guile we do want to keep using these format.
> Well, I want to make it clear that I'm not hung up on g-wrap as it is.
> If we need to change things, or even if we decide that we need to work
> on some other common effort, it sounds to me like a joint solution
> would benefit everyone.
I am especially interested in knowing how fast do libraries
binded using g-wrap is.
>
> Perfect sense. One thing we might want to decide is if it's OK that
> the API spec files are just scheme code. G-wrap handles it that way
> right now, but that could be changed.
We can even have some macros to deal with the defs file if necessary...
ariel