Re: The GTK2 line of development

[Stan Pinte <stan at altosw dot be>]

On Sat, 24 May 2003 12:41:11 +0100
Andy Wingo <wingo@pobox.com> wrote:

> Hello all,
> 
> I'm curious about the place of the GTK2 line of development within the
> whole guile-gtk project. It seems that some folks are not interested in
> GTK2 at all -- is this right? In that case, we have two separate
> projects (and in fact they share hardly any code, although I have used
> some ideas, as well as event-repl.scm from guile-gtk) and should put
> them in different places. What's the deal?
> 
> I suppose we can enumerate some options,
> 
>  - within savannah.nongnu.org
>    * has the advantage that all guile-gtk stuff is in the same place
>     (maybe it's an advantage, who knows)


I would favor that option, as I just moved the (gnome guile) code from the Gnome CVS to the savannah Guile-gtk project. (All the (gnome guile) code is in a separate module, under http://savannah.nongnu.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs/guile-gtk/gnome-guile-0.1/

Maybe the naming of the module needs some refactoring, we can discuss that. 

> 
>  - in gnome cvs
>    * keeps continuity with guile-gobject 0.2.0, although that work was
>      likely placed in gnome cvs just out of convenience for martin
> 
>  - where else? those seem to be the options. we could do sourceforge,
>    but that's subject to the whims of va software; that doesn't seem as
>    stable as savannah
> 
> In any case, the web page needs cleaning and updating so that we can
> make sense out of this mess. And that tarball really needs to make it
> into CVS somewhere.
> 
> Also, we need to decide on some module namespace issues, don't we? Right
> now all the GNOME 2 side is under (gnome). So we have (gnome gobject),
> (gnome gtk), (gnome gstreamer) [see gst-guile in gstreamer cvs], etc. Is
> this ok?
> 
> Can we get some input in here from those working on the 1.2 side of
> things as well as from 2.x? The sooner this gets settled, the sooner we
> can get some good work (and play) done :-)
> 
> regards,
> 
> wingo.
>