This is the mail archive of the guile@cygnus.com mailing list for the guile project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: could we rename ice9

To: Jim Blandy <jimb@red-bean.com>
Subject: Re: could we rename ice9
From: Mikael Djurfeldt <mdj@nada.kth.se>
Date: 21 Oct 1998 01:01:53 +0200
Cc: Maciej Stachowiak <mstachow@mit.edu>, guile@cygnus.com
Cc: mdj@nada.kth.se
References: <199810181334.JAA15760@huis-clos.mit.edu> <wwn1zo3jdzj.fsf@totoro.red-bean.com>

Jim Blandy <jimb@red-bean.com> writes:

> > I'd rather have the prefix for otherwise uncategorized modules that
> > ship with Guile be `guile', but `core' is an OK name too.
> 
> I like `guile'.  (guile r4rs) makes sense.

OK.  This means that it probably is suitable to rename the root module
(which is currently named (guile)).

It *is* possible to let the root module "contain" the other modules,
but it is cleaner to name it (guile root) or something similar...

/mdj

References:
- Re: could we rename ice9
  - From: Maciej Stachowiak <mstachow@mit.edu>
- Re: could we rename ice9
  - From: Jim Blandy <jimb@red-bean.com>

Prev by Date: Re: local-eval and quote
Next by Date: hobbit for guile-1.3
Prev by thread: Re: could we rename ice9
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] solaris socket communications bug workaround
Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]