This is the mail archive of the guile@cygnus.com mailing list for the guile project.
| Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
|---|---|---|
| Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
> > > > I think the value is good enough. Not the modified object needs to be > > > > in the root set, but the object that has a new reference to it. > > Is there a way to get the value you tried to assign? I've only played > around with it enough to get the address, and re-enable writing for > the page that faulted. I've not seen anything yet that uses the value > that the fault was trying to write. I assumed it was possible, and it > probably is, but I'm not entirely sure how you would go about > it... maybe looking at the last instruction to see what the value it > was trying to store was... it is a bit gross. Actually, now that I look at it, neither the PowerPC nor the MIPS give you the value being written. I guess the kernel could figure it out, but I doubt it does. We could disassemble the instruction, but we shouldn't.