This is the mail archive of the guile@cygnus.com mailing list for the guile project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
>I don't like repeating the signatures, firstly because they are easy >to extract from the actual definitions (and their presence in the definitions >is mandated by the scheme standard), secondly because one gets out of >date with the other. Well, I'm predicting that when a standard object system becomes available, people will make a lot more use of it. And you WOULD need to repeat the signature in the case of OO functions (which I agree is painful). It would be nice if the standard documentation method was similar to the OO one. Something like a keyword might be nice. (define :doco "something" (foo bar) ...)