This is the mail archive of the guile@cygnus.com mailing list for the guile project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Maciej Stachowiak <mstachow@alum.mit.edu> writes: > > Oops, wasn't keeping a close eye on the standard. I don't see why > > these couldn't be moved to numbers.c, though (couldn't we just lose > > the $blah functions, and do the entire thing in c?). > > That would probably be a good idea in general, but numbers.c tries to be > clever about lifting the C double-taking versions of these functions > almost > directly so it might be more work than you expect (I imagine it would > not > be too hard to provide a "complex" version of each of these functions as > well which takes two doubles per argument (or maybe even use the > built-in > complex functions on C systems that support them). > Actually, I'm right now just taking the very easy, do exactly what the current versions do approach (complex numbers apparently being something that I've completely repressed ;). -- Greg