guile archive
date index for May, 1999

This is the mail archive of the guile@cygnus.com mailing list for the Guile project.

Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to:

May 31, 1999
23:37 Re: Constructs for programming with sequences Lars Arvestad
20:34 Re: Constructs for programming with sequences Clark McGrew
20:21 Numbers reimplementation prerelease Greg Harvey
16:44 Re: New shared substring implementation Greg Harvey
16:07 Get The SOFTWARE They Want BANNED In All 50 STATES!!! UcanSpy2
15:32 Re: New shared substring implementation forcer
12:30 Re: Constructs for programming with sequences Mikael Djurfeldt
12:03 Constructs for programming with sequences Mikael Djurfeldt
11:27 Re: New shared substring implementation Mikael Djurfeldt
11:20 Re: New shared substring implementation Christian Lynbech
09:38 Re: New shared substring implementation Mikael Djurfeldt
08:59 Re: optargs questions David Lutterkort
04:37 Re: New shared substring implementation Christian Lynbech
01:31 New shared substring implementation forcer

May 30, 1999
15:30 optargs questions David Lutterkort

May 29, 1999
15:30 Gary Houston's ports; test suite framework Jim Blandy

May 28, 1999
10:37 Re: New smob interface Greg Harvey
03:36 Re: New smob interface Mikael Djurfeldt

May 27, 1999
12:03 Re: New smob interface Klaus Schilling
10:29 Re: New smob interface Greg Harvey
10:27 Re: Is guile byte-code compiled? Greg Harvey
01:33 Re: Is guile byte-code compiled? Christian Lynbech
01:33 Re: Is guile byte-code compiled? Christian Lynbech

May 26, 1999
12:33 Re: New smob interface Marius Vollmer
07:55 Re: receive tomfool
06:44 Re: Is guile byte-code compiled? Russ McManus
01:55 Re: Is guile byte-code compiled? Tanel Tammet
01:07 Re: Is guile byte-code compiled? Tanel Tammet
00:33 Re: receive Christian Lynbech
00:32 Re: Is guile byte-code compiled? Christian Lynbech

May 25, 1999
20:40 Re: receive Kevin Waddle
14:56 Re: New smob interface Mikael Djurfeldt
14:40 Re: New smob interface Mikael Djurfeldt
11:44 Re: receive Klaus Schilling
10:50 Re: Is guile byte-code compiled? Doug Evans
10:07 Re: Is guile byte-code compiled? Bradley M. Kuhn
09:48 Re: receive David Lutterkort
09:46 Re: receive Eric Marsden
06:43 receive Klaus Schilling
01:32 Re: Is guile byte-code compiled? Miroslav Silovic
00:51 Re: Is guile byte-code compiled? forcer

May 24, 1999
12:23 Re: Is guile byte-code compiled? Greg Harvey
09:22 Re: New smob interface Mikael Djurfeldt
09:20 Re: New smob interface Miroslav Silovic
08:52 New smob interface Klaus Schilling
06:55 Re: Is guile byte-code compiled? Mikael Djurfeldt
06:42 Re: New smob interface Mikael Djurfeldt
04:46 Re: Is guile byte-code compiled? forcer

May 23, 1999
18:30 Re: New smob interface Clark McGrew
17:31 Re: New smob interface Mikael Djurfeldt
17:31 Re: New smob interface Mikael Djurfeldt
17:22 Re: Is guile byte-code compiled? Mikael Djurfeldt
16:27 Re: Is guile byte-code compiled? Michael Schuerig
15:42 Re: New smob interface Ken Raeburn
15:26 multi-lingual support for Guile strings Ken Raeburn
15:01 New smob interface Klaus Schilling
14:32 Re: Is guile byte-code compiled? Mikael Djurfeldt
11:23 Re: Is guile byte-code compiled? forcer
11:18 New smob interface Mikael Djurfeldt
10:56 environments update Jost Boekemeier
04:27 Re: Is guile byte-code compiled? Mikael Djurfeldt
04:26 Re: Using async's in Guile. Mikael Djurfeldt

May 22, 1999
22:38 Re: Is guile byte-code compiled? Michael Vanier
22:38 Re: Is guile byte-code compiled? Keith Wright
19:36 thud-0.14 available thi
17:14 Is guile byte-code compiled? Michael Vanier
12:07 Re: searching an explanation: call/cc and 'do' strangeness Peder Chr. Norgaard
12:07 Re: searching an explanation: call/cc and 'do' strangeness Peder Chr. Norgaard
01:08 Re: Re[1]: Catching an error Alexandre Guillemet

May 21, 1999
13:47 Re[1]: Catching an error Eric M. Ludlam
12:55 Catching an error Alexandre Guillemet
09:44 LOOKING FOR THE PERFECT OPPORTUNITY? Billy

May 20, 1999
14:25 Re: Using async's in Guile. Bradley M. Kuhn
14:24 Re: Using async's in Guile. Bradley M. Kuhn
08:49 usage of calling.scm Klaus Schilling
02:50 Re: Using async's in Guile. Mikael Djurfeldt

May 19, 1999
15:25 Re: Using async's in Guile. Russ McManus
14:04 Using async's in Guile. Bradley M. Kuhn
09:55 Guile package maintainer? Jost Boekemeier

May 18, 1999
06:24 Your Ad to Millions ( we do the work ) truiomp
00:20 PATCH: iota Dirk Herrmann

May 17, 1999
23:39 Re: How can I write gh_longlong2scm, gh_ulonglong2scm and reverse? Rob Browning
02:56 Re: `undefine' Mikael Djurfeldt

May 16, 1999
14:09 Re: `undefine' Marisha Ray & Neil Jerram

May 15, 1999
12:00 iota Dirk Herrmann
11:25 Memoization [was: `undefine'] Greg Harvey
06:36 Re: `undefine' Jost Boekemeier
06:08 Re: `undefine' Jost Boekemeier
06:01 Re: `undefine' Jost Boekemeier

May 14, 1999
23:17 Re: How do I use readline? Michael Vanier
15:39 >>> L()K! Food Storage Meals Your Family Will Actually Want To Eat!! <<< healthyfoods
13:47 Re: `undefine' Mikael Djurfeldt
10:37 Re: How do I use readline? Allover Stripes
06:20 Re: How do I use readline? Julian R Fondren
01:59 Re: How do I use readline? Michael Vanier
01:40 How do I use readline? James Dean Palmer

May 13, 1999
18:52 Re: `undefine' Marisha Ray & Neil Jerram
13:42 How can I write gh_longlong2scm, gh_ulonglong2scm and reverse? Rob Browning
06:48 Re: c++ -> guile threading Russ McManus
01:22 Re: guile home page broken ? Klaus Schilling

May 12, 1999
17:41 Re: c++ -> guile threading Peter Amstutz
14:01 Re: guile home page broken ? Jim Blandy
13:59 Re: `undefine' Mikael Djurfeldt
12:47 Re: c++ -> guile threading Greg Harvey
03:37 `undefine' Jost Boekemeier

May 11, 1999
22:09 Re: c++ -> guile threading Keith Wright
16:32 Re: c++ -> guile threading Greg Harvey
15:02 Re: c++ -> guile threading Peter Amstutz
14:17 Re: Reintroducing old `defined?' Marius Vollmer
14:06 Re: guile-gtk Marius Vollmer
13:23 Re: c++ -> guile threading Greg Harvey
11:32 Your Ad to Millions jumerop
09:08 Re: guile home page broken ? Karl Fogel
02:26 Re: Reintroducing old `defined?' Mikael Djurfeldt
01:39 Re: Guile and --with-readline? Ivan Toshkov
00:08 Re: Guile and --with-readline? Klaus Schilling
00:07 guile-gtk Klaus Schilling

May 10, 1999
15:25 Re: guile home page broken ? David
15:03 Re: Reintroducing old `defined?' Russ McManus
14:53 Re: c++ -> guile threading Peter Amstutz
14:51 Re: Reintroducing old `defined?' Mikael Djurfeldt
12:36 Re: Reintroducing old `defined?' Greg Harvey
12:33 Re: guile home page broken ? Greg Harvey
12:14 Re: Reintroducing old `defined?' Russ McManus
12:10 Re: c++ -> guile threading Greg Harvey
10:58 Re: Guile and --with-readline? Peter Amstutz
10:58 Re: Reintroducing old `defined?' Mikael Djurfeldt
09:32 Re: Reintroducing old `defined?' Russ McManus
08:14 Re: Reintroducing old `defined?' Mikael Djurfeldt
08:04 Re: Reintroducing old `defined?' (was Re: Testing availabilty of a procedure) Mikael Djurfeldt
06:56 Re: Reintroducing old `defined?' Jost Boekemeier
05:10 Re: c++ -> guile threading Russ McManus
04:48 Re: Reintroducing old `defined?' Mikael Djurfeldt
04:17 Re: environment-fold Mikael Djurfeldt
04:16 Re: Guile and --with-readline? Mikael Djurfeldt
04:15 guile home page broken ? David
04:15 Re: Reintroducing old `defined?' Mikael Djurfeldt
00:57 Re: c++ -> guile threading Peter Amstutz
00:57 Re: interate over the a public interface? Ole Myren R|hne

May 09, 1999
17:24 Re: c++ -> guile threading Peter Amstutz
12:20 environment-fold Jim Blandy
12:20 Re: Guile and --with-readline? Jim Blandy
12:20 Re: Reintroducing old `defined?' Jim Blandy
12:20 Re: interate over the a public interface? Jim Blandy
04:29 Re: c++ -> guile threading Mikael Djurfeldt

May 08, 1999
13:57 Re: c++ -> guile threading Greg Harvey
13:20 Re: c++ -> guile threading Peter Amstutz
11:36 Re: c++ -> guile threading Greg Harvey
11:30 No regrets Charlie
06:11 Re: iterate over the a public interface? Clark McGrew
03:53 interate over the a public interface? thi

May 07, 1999
23:05 interate over the a public interface? Clark McGrew
13:47 Re: c++ -> guile threading Peter Amstutz
12:50 Re: c++ -> guile threading Greg Harvey
12:12 Re: implementing data tags via object properties -- help with debugging? Russ McManus
12:09 c++ -> guile threading Peter Amstutz
11:26 Re: implementing data tags via object properties -- help with debugging? robertb
11:24 guile-gtk David
11:24 Re: implementing data tags via object properties -- help with debugging? thi
11:22 Re: global variables & data tags (a la X-Windows callbacks) Greg Harvey
10:39 Re: implementing data tags via object properties -- help with debugging? robertb
10:38 implementing data tags via object properties -- help with debugging? thi
08:18 implementing data tags via object properties -- help with debugging? Robert Brown
05:00 Re: Reintroducing old `defined?' (was Re: Testing availabilty of a procedure) Jost Boekemeier
03:52 Re: Coroutines with call/cc Peder Chr. Norgaard
03:47 Re: Reintroducing old `defined?' (was Re: Testing availabilty of a procedure) Mikael Djurfeldt
03:45 Re: Coroutines with call/cc Mikael Djurfeldt

May 06, 1999
15:06 Re: Reintroducing old `defined?' (was Re: Testing availabilty of a procedure) Marius Vollmer
06:59 Re: undefine (Re: Reintroducing old `defined?') Jost Boekemeier

May 05, 1999
18:43 Re: Guile and --with-readline? Clark McGrew
18:38 Re: global variables & data tags (a la X-Windows callbacks) Clark McGrew
14:55 Guile and --with-readline? forcer
10:36 Re: global variables & data tags (a la X-Windows callbacks) Robert Brown
10:35 Re: Direction Greg Harvey
09:09 Re: Direction Ray Lehtiniemi
08:12 Re: Direction guile
06:51 Re: global variables & data tags (a la X-Windows callbacks) robertb
05:36 Re: Reintroducing old `defined?' (was Re: Testing availabilty of a procedure) Roland Orre
05:06 Re: Reintroducing old `defined?' (was Re: Testing availabilty of a procedure) Mikael Djurfeldt
01:17 Re: Direction Clark McGrew
01:11 Re: Direction Mark Galassi
00:12 Re: Direction Greg Badros

May 04, 1999
23:38 Re: Direction Ian Bicking
22:44 Direction Klaus Schilling
22:44 Interested in GOOPS Klaus Schilling
22:16 Re: Direction Greg Badros
21:26 Re: Direction Lalo Martins
21:26 Re: Direction Clark McGrew
21:25 Re: Direction tomfool
21:06 Re: Direction Havoc Pennington
21:06 Re: Direction Greg Badros
19:36 Re: Direction Clark McGrew
19:16 Re: Reintroducing old `defined?' Clark McGrew
19:15 Re: Reintroducing old `defined?' (was Re: Testing availabilty of a procedure) Clark McGrew
18:54 Re: Direction Clark McGrew
18:42 Re: Direction Greg Harvey
16:30 Re: Reintroducing old `defined?' (was Re: Testing availabilty of a procedure) Marius Vollmer
16:30 Direction Lalo Martins
14:32 Re: Thank you everybody (was: searching an explanation: call/cc and'do' strangeness) Peder Chr. Norgaard
13:12 Re: Reintroducing old `defined?' Mikael Djurfeldt
12:58 undefine (Re: Reintroducing old `defined?') Mikael Djurfeldt
11:13 Re: Reintroducing old `defined?' thi
10:18 Re: scm_heap_org considered harmfull Greg Harvey
08:30 Re: Thank you everybody (was: searching an explanation: call/ccand 'do' strangeness) Dirk Herrmann
08:26 Re: Reintroducing old `defined?' Roland Orre
08:26 Re: Reintroducing old `defined?' Roland Orre
06:42 Re: global variables & data tags (a la X-Windows callbacks) Russ McManus
06:40 Thank you everybody (was: searching an explanation: call/cc and 'do'strangeness) Peder Chr. Norgaard
05:02 Re: Reintroducing old `defined?' (was Re: Testing availabilty of a procedure) Jost Boekemeier
05:02 Re: Reintroducing old `defined?' Jost Boekemeier
02:40 Re: Reintroducing old `defined?' Clark McGrew
02:24 Re: Reintroducing old `defined?' Harvey J. Stein
02:23 scm_heap_org considered harmfull Christian Lynbech
01:02 Re: global variables & data tags (a la X-Windows callbacks) Lars Arvestad

May 03, 1999
23:20 Re: Reintroducing old `defined?' Keith Wright
19:44 Re: global variables & data tags (a la X-Windows callbacks) thi
14:19 Re: global variables & data tags (a la X-Windows callbacks) Robert Brown
10:24 Re: Testing availabilty of a procedure Greg Harvey
10:16 global variables & data tags (a la X-Windows callbacks) Robert Brown
10:15 Re: Reintroducing old `defined?' (was Re: Testing availabilty of a procedure) Greg Harvey
10:08 Interested in GOOPS Tijs van Bakel
08:00 Re: Reintroducing old `defined?' (was Re: Testing availabilty of a procedure) Bertrand Petit
07:06 Reintroducing old `defined?' (was Re: Testing availabilty of a procedure) Mikael Djurfeldt
04:28 Quick Money. rwegyua

May 02, 1999
22:16 Re: Testing availabilty of a procedure Roland Orre
14:18 Re: Testing availabilty of a procedure Lalo Martins
12:53 Re: Testing availabilty of a procedure Roland Orre
12:53 Re: Testing availabilty of a procedure Bertrand Petit
09:36 Testing availabilty of a procedure Ingo Hohmann

May 01, 1999
09:21 Re: what's with CVS ? (was: ghobbit - what's going on?) Greg Harvey


Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to:

Mail converted by MHonArc 2.3.3